Exculpatory Clause

Get free proposals from vetted lawyers in our marketplace.

Contract Clauses

• Acceleration Clause
• Arbitration Clause
• Assignment Clause
• Cancellation Clause
• Choice of Law Clause
• Confidentiality Clause
• Consideration Clause
• Definitions Clause
• Dispute Resolution Clause
• Entire Agreement Clause
• Escalation Clause
• Exclusivity Clause
• Exculpatory Clause
• Force Majeure Clause
• Governing Law Clause
• Indemnification Clause
• Indemnity Clause
• Insurance Clause
• Integration Clause
• Merger Clause
• Non-Competition Clause
• Non-Disparagement Clause
• Non-Exclusivity Clause
• Non-Solicitation Clause
• Privacy Clause
• Release Clause
• Severability Clause
• Subordination Clause
• Subrogation Clause
• Survival Clause
• Termination Clause
• Time of Essence Clause

Jump to Section

What is an Exculpatory Clause?

An exculpatory clause is a contract provision in a legal contract that relieves a party of liability of any damages that may occur during the execution of the contract. For example, these clauses are often included in contracts when a service provider encounters a customer’s personal property or is responsible for a customer’s wellbeing.

Typically, exculpatory clauses are written and issued by the party seeking to relieve blame. For this reason, courts generally look unfavorably towards exculpatory clauses. This is because it is a way for a party to shirk responsibility for damages.

Some common examples of activities that may use exculpatory clauses include:

• A parking lot receipt. Often, parking receipts will state that they are not responsible for stolen items or damage to a vehicle when parked in a lot.
• Property lease. Landlords use exculpatory clauses to relieve themselves of responsibility if there is a loss, injury, or damage while a renter is on their property.
• The dry cleaners. Suppose you drop clothes off at a dry cleaner. In that case, your receipt will most likely include an exculpatory clause relieving the company of responsibility if your clothes are damaged.
• A gym membership. The membership application most likely includes an exculpatory clause if you belong to a gym. If you are injured while working out, you will not hold the gym responsible.
• A dangerous activity. If you have ever participated in skydiving, ziplining, white water rafting, or any other activity in which you could be injured, you probably signed a contract with an exculpatory clause. This would relieve the company from any responsibility for injuries you may suffer while participating in dangerous activities.

Purpose of an Exculpatory Clause

The primary purpose of an exculpatory clause is to relieve one party of liability in the event of an accident or damage during the execution of a contract.

For example, suppose you are on vacation and scuba diving on a charter boat. In that case, you will probably sign an exculpatory clause. If you are injured while on the boat or while diving, in theory, you will not be able to take legal action against the charter company for damages you suffered.

Difference Between Exculpation and Indemnification

Exculpation and indemnification are very similar. Both clauses in a contract seek to remove liability from one party. However, the main difference is that while an exculpatory clause seeks to deny a party the right to recover damages, an indemnification clause attempts to shift liability to another party.

Daniel R.

Gill D.

Tabetha H.

Stacey D.

Are Exculpatory Clauses Enforceable?

The enforcement of exculpatory clauses is controversial. As a result, it isn’t uncommon for parties to challenge exculpatory clauses in court.

Generally, exculpatory clauses are enforceable if reasonable and meet specific criteria. However, several factors come into play when a court considers an exculpatory clause, including:

• Is the clause conspicuous? Exculpatory clauses need to be separate from the rest of the contract, should be clearly labeled, and need to be eye-catching. Using a different or bold font is one way to make an exculpatory clause stand out.
• Is the clause clear and understandable? An ordinary person without legal training should be able to read and easily read the exculpatory clause and understand what they are agreeing on.
• Is the clause specific? The clause should not be vague and should clearly explain the risks involved in the signing. In addition, it should include particular theories of liability like negligence.
• Is there equal bargaining power? Bargaining power is essential when determining if an exculpatory clause should be upheld. For example, courts will often strike down an exculpatory clause if they believe the signing party was at an unfair disadvantage.
• Is the intent of the parties clear? The exculpatory clause needs to state the intention to relieve a party from liability.

It is important to remember that an exculpatory clause cannot excuse liability from harm when the damages occurred due to intentional or reckless behavior. This includes deliberate acts and gross negligence.

There are several other instances when an exculpatory clause would be deemed unenforceable by a court. These reasons include:

• Ambiguous language. If the agreement is unclear, it cannot be enforced because the signing party may not understand the rights they are waiving.
• Fraud. Suppose the court finds that a party falsified a material fact with the intent to deceive and the other party relied on that fact. In that case, the exculpatory clause will not be upheld.
• Contrary to the public interest. The public policy test is often used by courts to determine the enforceability of an exculpatory clause. This test considers bargaining power between the parties and whether a company is working contrary to the public interest.
• Violates a statute. The terms in an exculpatory clause cannot violate any laws.

Exculpatory Clause in a Mortgage

Mortgage contracts often contain exculpatory clauses to relieve a borrower from personal liability. If the borrower defaults on the mortgage, the lender cannot acquire the borrower’s personal property as collateral, but only the property associated with the mortgage. This is done through a foreclosure proceeding.

Exculpatory Clause in a Construction Contract

It is common to see exculpatory clauses used in a construction contract. The clause would be used to limit the construction company’s risk and liability while completing a project.

For example, suppose a construction company is building a house. In that case, they may include an exculpatory clause in their contract that relieves them from responsibility for any damage while working.

As with all exculpatory clauses, if any damages arise from gross negligence or deliberate acts, the exculpatory clause does not apply.

Exculpatory Clause in a Loan Agreement

Much like a mortgage, other loan agreements can also contain exculpatory clauses. Most loan agreements will include provisions that state:

1. The borrower has no personal liability for the loan
2. The borrower’s liability is limited to the value of the loan

This clause protects a borrower from a lender going after their personal property. Suppose the loan is for property, like a vehicle. The lender can only repossess the vehicle. In that case, the borrower cannot sue for a deficiency judgment.

Exculpatory clauses in loans heavily favor the borrower. For this reason, many lenders do not like to negotiate exculpatory clauses in their agreements.

Get Help with an Exculpatory Clause

Do you need help with an exculpatory clause? If so, post a project in ContractsCounsel’s marketplace to receive flat fee bids from contract lawyers to handle your project. All lawyers on the ContractsCounsel’s platform are vetted by our team to make sure you are provided with top tier service.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Daniel R.

Gill D.

Tabetha H.

Stacey D.

Meet some of our Lawyers

Michael W.

Michael W.

Graduate of Georgetown Law (J.D. and LL.M in Taxation) Injury Claims Adjuster before law school for top insurer Eight plus years of legal experience Past roles: Associate at premier boutique law firm in the DC metro area Policy Associate at a large academic and research institution Solo Practice Areas of Expertise: Contracts Business Formation Trusts and Estates Demand Letters Entertainment Transactions

Matthew F.

Matthew F.

As a business law attorney serving Coral Springs, Parkland, and Broward County, FL, Matthew has been recognized as “AV” rated, which is the highest rating an attorney can achieve through Martindale’s Peer Review system. Year after year Matthew is listed in the “Legal Leaders” publication as a top-rated attorney in South Florida in the areas of litigation, commercial litigation, and real estate. Matthew is also a graduate and instructor of the Kaufman Foundation’s FastTrac NewVenture Program, presented by the Broward County Office of Economic and Small Business Development.

Donya G.

Donya G.

I am a licensed and active NY and CT Contracts Attorney, with over 20 years of diverse legal and business experience. I specialize in reviewing, drafting and negotiating commercial agreements. My practice focuses on working with small business clients as well as clients from international brokerage firms on acquisitions, especially in the Ecommerce space; drafting, negotiating, reviewing and advising on business agreements; ; breach of contract issues, contract disputes and arbitration. I am licensed to practice in New York and Connecticut, and am a FINRA and NCDS Arbitrator. My experience includes serving as General Counsel to small businesses. This entails reviewing, updating and drafting contracts such as employments agreements, asset purchase agreements, master services agreements, operating agreements and a variety of business and commercial contracts. Additionally, I assist clients with business strategies, contract disputes and arbitration. My diverse experience allows me to give my clients a well-rounded approach to the issues they face. I have been at top AML law firms; a Vice President at an Investment Bank, a Civil Court Arbitrator presiding over cases in contract law, commercial law, a Hearing Officer, presiding over cases and rendering written decisions, and a Judicial Clerk to a Civil Court Judge. It would be a privilege to assist you and your business with my services.

Carlos C.

Carlos C.

Carlos Colón-Machargo is a fully bilingual (English-Spanish) attorney-at-law and Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with over twenty years of experience. His major areas of practice include labor and employment law; business law; corporate, contract and tax law; and estate planning. He is currently admitted to practice law in Georgia, Florida, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico and currently licensed as a CPA in Florida. He received a Master of Laws from the Georgetown University Law Center in 1997, where he concentrated in Labor and Employment Law (LL. M. in Labor and Employment Law) and a Juris Doctor, cum laude, from the Inter American University.

John B.

John B.

John Benemerito is the Founder and Managing Partner of Benemerito Attorneys at Law. Admitted to practice in New York and New Jersey, John represents small business owners and startups in the areas of Business and Securities Law. John received his Bachelors Degree at John Jay College of Criminal Justice where he majored in Criminal Justice. Afterwards, he attended New York Law School where he focused his studies on Corporate and Securities Law. John comes from a family of entrepreneurs. From as far back as he can remember he was always involved in his family’s numerous businesses. At the age of fifteen, John entered into a new business venture with his father and managed to grow and maintain that business through high school, college and law school.John is currently a co founder in over five different businesses. After law school, John decided that he wanted to help people like himself. He opened his own law practice and began working primarily with small business owners until he was introduced into the startup world. Ever since that time, John has worked with hundreds of startups and thousands of entrepreneurs from all different backgrounds in helping them achieve their goals. Having been an entrepreneur his entire life, John understands what it takes to create and maintain a successful business. He enjoys sitting down and working with his clients in figuring out each of their unique challenges.